New systems
Preliminary sizing, integration with the existing and consistent with consumption profiles.
TèKHNE / SERVICES
We compare technical solutions, costs and benefits to build solid decisions and prepare the implementation path.
A good solution must work on the site, on the accounts and over time.
We relate energy needs, plant constraints, technological alternatives and management conditions. We distinguish what has already been verified from hypotheses that require surveys, offers or planning.
The technical and economic comparison helps to choose whether to proceed, with which solution and with which further analysis. When relevant, we include incentives and procurement procedures in the decision framework.
Preliminary sizing, integration with the existing and consistent with consumption profiles.
Scenarios for energy replacement, regulation or recovery, considered together with site constraints.
Priority, technical perimeter and useful elements for setting up subsequent planning and awarding.
02 / THE RIGHT QUESTIONS
The economic hypotheses are explicit: results and economic viability depend on use, prices, useful life and operating conditions.
Initial costs, ancillary works, integration and activities necessary for start-up.
Consumption, operating costs, maintenance and expected performance compared to the initial situation.
Technical constraints, price variability, resource availability and data still to be verified.
03 / THE PATH
The depth of the evaluation grows with the maturity of the project and with the decisions to be made.
We define needs, budget, time, site conditions and criteria against which to compare options.
We select consistent alternatives and estimate their performance, integrations and requirements.
We assess investment, savings and costs over the project’s lifetime. Where appropriate, we use cash flows, NPV, IRR and sensitivity scenarios.
We clarify residual checks, any support opportunities and documents useful for planning or awarding.
04 / WHAT THE CLIENT RECEIVES
An evaluation that is also readable for those who have to approve the investment, manage the intervention or verify its effects.
View projects ↗Solutions, perimeter, expected performances and conditions necessary for their implementation.
Costs, benefits, hypotheses and relevant indicators, highlighting the most sensitive variables.
Priorities, checks to be completed and subsequent activities: from the project to possible access to support tools.
05 / TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTATION
The availability of an incentive or the form of assignment do not alone define the quality of the intervention. They are evaluated in the specific case and on the current framework.
We verify applicable measure, beneficiary, eligible expenses, requirements, timing and compatibility with other forms of support. No contribution is taken for granted before the checks.
We support the definition of the technical perimeter and the design elements useful for the procedure, in coordination with the client and with the professionals responsible for the administrative and legal aspects.
For the active tools and applicable procedures, we consult official sources and verify the conditions at the date of the assignment.
BEFORE YOU START
Yes. An initial analysis allows us to compare orders of magnitude and identify missing information. The precision of the estimates increases with available surveys, data and offers.
No. We also consider useful life, operating costs, maintenance, risks, quality of performance and client objectives.
We present them as separate scenarios until the requirements, availability, access methods and whether the available incentives can be combined have been verified.
LET'S START FROM YOUR PROJECT
Share the idea, the available data and the decision to be made.